Quantcast

Netflix Flirts with 'Big' Movies

Discussion in 'Off-Topic Discussion' started by Greenenergyassessors, Oct 29, 2013.

  1. Greenenergyassessors

    Greenenergyassessors New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2012
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Swansea,UK
    Netflix Floats "Day and Date" Release for "Big" Movies - Peter Kafka - Media - AllThingsD

    [h=1]Netflix Flirts With a New Idea: “Big” Movies at Your House, the Same Day They’re in Theaters[/h]
    Netflix made a splash this year by creating its own TV shows and delivering them over the Web. Now it’s toying with the same idea for movies.
    This summer, the company announced that it in addition to TV shows like “Orange Is the New Black,” it would start spending money on modest movies — documentaries and stand-up comedy specials — which would debut on the service.
    Now Netflix is floating the idea that it will foot the bill for a “big” movie, which would appear in theaters and on Netflix at the same time.
    During the company’s earnings call last week, content boss Ted Sarandos said the company was interested in breaking into movies, and that investors should “keep [their] mind wide open to what those films would be and what they would look like.”
    This weekend, Sarandos got more explicit. In a speech hosted by Film Independent, the nonprofit behind the indie film Spirit Awards, Sarandos said Netflix could start delivering new movies to its subscribers by doing the same thing it has done with its original TV shows, and becoming a first-run distributor.
    “What we’re trying to do for TV, the model should extend pretty nicely to movies. Meaning, why not premiere movies on Netflix, the same day they’re opening in theaters? And not little movies — there’s a lot of ways, and lot of people to do that [already]. Why not big movies? Why not follow the consumers’ desire to watch things when they want?”
    Good logic. And hard to imagine how that will work.
    But presumably that’s Sarandos’s point — Netflix wants to show that it can do it, at least once, and put pressure on the rest of Hollywood to change.
    And there’s some nice symbolism here, too: Netflix started out delivering movies via DVD, which it could do without Hollywood’s permission. It eventually moved into a digital TV show service, at least in part because it couldn’t get the studios to let it distribute their movies over the Web. Wouldn’t it be cool if Netflix could start to end run the system and deliver movies that way, too?
    As Sarandos notes, it’s already possible to see some art house movies at home, via distributors like Apple or Time Warner Cable, at the same time they’re in theaters. (Sometimes even before they’re in theaters).
    But almost all major Hollywood movies follow a rigid “windowing” system, where they show up in theaters first, then on DVD and “on demand” services, then on pay TV (and sometimes Netflix), etc.
    Films studios themselves have expressed interest in tweaking those windows, so movies could migrate more quickly from theaters to other venues, but theater owners, who play a big role in movie marketing, have been fiercely opposed to any changes. (See: “Tower Heist” or “Alice in Wonderland.”)
    And I can’t see Sarandos convincing any studio with a traditional blockbuster that needs conventional theaters to change course anytime soon. If you want to see “Thor: The Dark World” on November 8, you’re still going to have to visit the box office.
    So perhaps Sarandos has a different definition of a “big” movie in mind. Or maybe some other clever end run around the system.
    Feel free to watch his speech below (don’t be scared off the by 44-minute counter on the YouTube clip; his prepared speech only goes 22 minutes, and if you need to go fast you can speed up to the 19-minute mark) and reach your own conclusions. For now, Netflix reps aren’t offering any additional comment.
     
  2. ericd

    ericd Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2013
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Sounds like a good plan but it's a little un-nerving at the same time. I can see a time in the not to distant future where, after the success of the "same day as theatrical release" plan, Netflix starts a pay per view or premium subscription plan within the existing subscription. If this is successful, how much of a stretch is it for Netflix to move some, or most, of it's more popular shows into the premium or PPV areas, leaving the basic subscribers with little decent content. Just look at what happened to Hulu/Hulu plus
     
  3. Carlszone

    Carlszone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2012
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    182
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Norfolk Va
    Hi

    I don't see that happening. Netflix is providing an alternative to the major studios, just like the music industry broke away from the big record labels and made their own studios. The availability of the music didn't change because of this. Netflix is attractive because of its affordable subscription service. To add a premium subscription might prove more profitable in the short term, but would detract from its popularity in the long run. Remember how the separation of DVD and streaming subscriptions nearly destroyed the company early on. Now we can see that having both options makes sense. Why rent/buy a DVD when you can stream it or own it on-line.

    I dislike most DVD players because there is usually excess noise from the machine themselves. Streaming makes more sense. No late fees and no waiting. Netflix producing their own shows and movies will attract a larger user base and pay the cost of production w/out resorting to a Premium service.

    I hope...

    Carl
     

Share This Page