Quantcast

Cisco's Umi is a flop

Discussion in 'More News from Your Google TV News Team' started by Rickaren, Mar 11, 2011.

  1. Rickaren

    Rickaren New Member Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    Messages:
    1,167
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Indiana, Logitech Revue
    I Told You So, Cisco


    Rick Aristotle Munarriz
    March 11, 2011


    Cisco's Umi is a flop.


    The networking giant was hoping to make a big splash with the Umi Telepresence, Cisco's first foray into consumer videoconferencing.


    "If you've ever dreamed of The Jetsons' video teleconferencing vision of the future, have deep pockets, and have somehow slept through the past several years, has Cisco got a gadget for you," I wrote at the time.


    Carrying a "stiff price tag that would even make Rosie the robotic maid blush," Cisco thought it would be able to sell a high-def video chat platform for $600, paired up with chunky $25 a month subscription plans.


    Cisco overestimated the high-end market's potential. It also underestimated consumer intelligence. The Umi couldn't compete with subscription-free videoconferencing platforms put out by Google , Apple , and Skype.


    Logitech's $300 Revue powered by Google TV -- paired with a $150 Logitech TV Cam -- could get friends and families videoconferencing in high-def without the monthly charges! Apple's FaceTime and Skype will continue to grow their user bases.


    Well, Cisco sort of gets it now. This week it announced that it would be slashing the Umi's price by $100. It's also introducing a 720p model for those who don't need 1080p at a $399 price point.


    Cisco's saving its biggest cut for its monthly plans. A 60% haircut now finds Umi connectivity only costing $9.95 a month or $99 a year.


    It's a strong step in the right direction, but it's not going to be enough.


    The Umi launched with great expectations. Cisco's plan involved an appearance on Oprah Winfrey's show and actively marketed to Best Buy shoppers and Verizon's FiOS customers.


    Maybe the better strategy would have been to go through Vonage VG or other broadband telephone providers as a premium add-on for their existing voice customers.


    The problem with Umi's out-of-whack pricing is that this is a product that requires a wide user base to work. You don't buy a Umi unless you know others already on the system. The emotional push of visually uniting long-distance families rings hollow when every home has to meet the tech requirements and have the financial means to bankroll the three-figure hardware investment and the $99 annual connectivity fee.


    Viral means never having to pay a monthly usage fee when it competes with tech giants who have dramatically cheaper workarounds.


    Maybe this is it. This could be as low as Cisco could conceivably go on price before it throws in the towel. By this point next year, Umi may be the next FloTV corporate discard. Cisco can't keep playing limbo forever. It obviously doesn't want to cheapen this offering to the point where it hurts its more lucrative enterprise videoconferencing. However, if an ordinary guy like me saw this "flop" coming months ago, why didn't a company that at one point commanded the country's largest market cap didn't see it?


    One can't go through life with Umi-tinted glasses.

     
  2. towboy123

    towboy123 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    OBX of NC
    I looked at it when it first came out and couldn't believe they wanted $600 for a cam. The specs where great but how many people actually have $600 plus monthly fees to talk to maybe 1 friend of equal finacial status.

    If it were less Than $300 and no monthly fees it would still cost to much.
     

Share This Page